![]() ![]() Moore’s lawyer said his punishment amounts to the same thing. Prosecutors in Mahoning County argued the multiple sentences make Moore’s punishment constitutional, even though they “may preclude the possibility of release during the juvenile offender’s life,” according to an August filing with the court. “While I would gladly add my voice to the conversation supporting the creation of separate sentencing guidelines for juvenile offenders who are bound over to the adult system, I cannot join today’s majority when there is no basis in law and when to do so, in my opinion, would violate the separation-of-powers doctrine,” Kennedy wrote. She also said the state appeals court that heard Moore’s delayed request to overturn his sentence didn’t have authority to do so. Supreme Court’s ruling didn’t address stacked sentences. Justice Sharon Kennedy, writing for the minority, said Moore’s sentence should stand because the U.S. It “is clear that the court intended more than to simply allow juveniles-turned-nonagenarians the opportunity to breathe their last breaths as free people,” Pfeifer said. Supreme Court ruling applies even to cases like Moore’s, who would be 92 when first eligible for parole, Pfeifer said. Justice Paul Pfeifer, writing for the majority, cited the brutality of Moore’s crime and noted that the facts “do not engender a sense of sympathy for him.” Article contentĪt issue was whether the ruling applied to Moore, whose prison term imposed in 2008 consists of multiple sentences stacked on top of one another. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. ![]() ![]() Manage Print Subscription / Tax Receipt. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |